Download PDF
Advanced Analytics for the Factory of the Future: A Case Study on Ashland Manufacturing
Technology Category
- Analytics & Modeling - Real Time Analytics
- Platform as a Service (PaaS) - Application Development Platforms
Applicable Industries
- Cement
- Pharmaceuticals
Applicable Functions
- Quality Assurance
Use Cases
- Additive Manufacturing
- Manufacturing Process Simulation
Services
- Testing & Certification
The Challenge
Ashland Manufacturing, a $5 billion US-based provider of specialty chemical solutions, was facing a series of challenges. The company was shifting its focus from construction materials to pharmaceuticals, a transition that brought about new challenges. This shift required higher added value, lower product throughput, and more control over production processes. The company was also dealing with seemingly 'unsolvable' production issues and a need for operational efficiency to boost quality and profitability. There was also pressure to increase Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) production throughput. Furthermore, the company had to navigate the new territory of strict GMP standards relating to pharmaceutical product quality.
About The Customer
Ashland Manufacturing is a $5 billion US-based provider of specialty chemical solutions. The company employs 7,000 people worldwide and consists of two commercial units: performance materials and specialty (pharmaceutical) ingredients. The company has been manufacturing construction materials since the seventies and has slowly shifted its product focus towards personal care and pharmaceuticals. This transition has sparked fresh challenges for Ashland, requiring a shift towards achieving higher added value, lower product throughput, and more control over its production processes. The company's plant in Doel, Belgium handles the specialty ingredients.
The Solution
To address these challenges, Ashland turned to TrendMiner’s self-service industrial analytics solution. This platform provided actionable insights from processing data, analyzed automated plant production data in near real-time, and visualized this data for the team to apply proven methodologies such as Six Sigma and the DMAIC cycle. The platform was easily integrated with existing AspenTech IP.21 historian software, allowing product engineers to use it with familiar tooling like computer aided engineering (CAE) and advanced analytics without needing a data scientist. TrendMiner helped engineers discover which factors in the process were influencing the quality of the finished product and enabled process and production engineers to raise certain 'red flags' and prevent incidents from happening in the future.
Operational Impact
Quantitative Benefit
Related Case Studies.
Case Study
Case Study: Pfizer
Pfizer’s high-performance computing software and systems for worldwide research and development support large-scale data analysis, research projects, clinical analytics, and modeling. Pfizer’s computing services are used across the spectrum of research and development efforts, from the deep biological understanding of disease to the design of safe, efficacious therapeutic agents.
Case Study
System 800xA at Indian Cement Plants
Chettinad Cement recognized that further efficiencies could be achieved in its cement manufacturing process. It looked to investing in comprehensive operational and control technologies to manage and derive productivity and energy efficiency gains from the assets on Line 2, their second plant in India.
Case Study
Fusion Middleware Integration on Cloud for Pharma Major
Customer wanted a real-time, seamless, cloud based integration between the existing on premise and cloud based application using SOA technology on Oracle Fusion Middleware Platform, a Contingent Worker Solution to collect, track, manage and report information for on-boarding, maintenance and off-boarding of contingent workers using a streamlined and Integrated business process, and streamlining of integration to the back-end systems and multiple SaaS applications.
Case Study
Process Control System Support
In many automated production facilities, changes are made to SIMATIC PCS 7 projects on a daily basis, with individual processes often optimised by multiple workers due to shift changes. Documentation is key here, as this keeps workers informed about why a change was made. Furthermore, SIMATIC PCS 7 installations are generally used in locations where documentation is required for audits and certification. The ability to track changes between two software projects is not only an invaluable aid during shift changes, but also when searching for errors or optimising a PCS 7 installation. Every change made to the system is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Moreover, there is also the risk that errors may occur. If a change is saved in the project, then the old version is lost unless a backup copy was created in advance. If no backup was created, it will no longer be possible to return to the previous state if and when programming errors occur. Each backup denotes a version used by the SIMATIC PCS 7 system to operate an installation. To correctly interpret a version, information is required on WHO changed WHAT, WHERE, WHEN and WHY: - Who created the version/who is responsible for the version? - Who released the version? - What was changed in the version i.e. in which block or module of the SIMATIC PCS 7 installation were the changes made? - When was the version created? Is this the latest version or is there a more recent version? - Why were the changes made to the version? If they are part of a regular maintenance cycle, then is the aim to fix an error or to improve production processes? - Is this particular version also the version currently being used in production? The fact that SIMATIC PCS 7 projects use extremely large quantities of data complicates the situation even further, and it can take a long time to load and save information as a result. Without a sustainable strategy for operating a SIMATIC PCS 7 installation, searching for the right software version can become extremely time-consuming and the installation may run inefficiently as a result.
Case Study
Drug Maker Takes the Right Prescription
China Pharm decided to build a cloud-based platform to support the requirements of IT planning for the next five to ten years which includes a dynamic and scalable mail resource pool platform. The platform needed to have the following functions: all nodes support redundancy, ensuring service continuity and good user experience, simple and easy-to-use user interfaces for end users and administrators and good compatibility and supports smooth capacity expansion.