Download PDF
Eaton's Aerospace Group's Efficiency and Accuracy Enhancement in Hydraulic Systems Analysis with HyperWorks
Technology Category
- Actuators - Hydraulic Actuators
- Sensors - Level Sensors
Applicable Industries
- Aerospace
- Automotive
Applicable Functions
- Product Research & Development
- Quality Assurance
Use Cases
- Experimentation Automation
- Virtual Prototyping & Product Testing
Services
- Testing & Certification
The Challenge
The Hydraulic Systems Division of Eaton’s Aerospace Group, based in Jackson, Mississippi, is responsible for designing hydraulic components and systems for many of the world’s military and commercial aircraft. The division conducts virtual testing of many of its designs, including stress analysis, computational fluid dynamics, and dynamic simulation for hydraulic pumps, actuators, motors, and related components. However, the division faced a significant challenge in improving efficiency in meshing. Before 2002, the Analysis Group used a process built into a solver for use on finite-element models. This process was not designed for finite-element analysis and often failed to provide the quality mesh needed when dealing with complex hydraulic components. Meshing complex hydraulic component geometry required a great deal of effort and time, making the process inefficient and cumbersome.
About The Customer
Eaton's Aerospace Group is a leading provider of hydraulic components and systems for many of the world’s military and commercial aircraft. The Hydraulic Systems Division, based in Jackson, Mississippi, is particularly focused on the design and testing of hydraulic pumps, actuators, motors, and related components. The division conducts a range of tests, including stress analysis, computational fluid dynamics, and dynamic simulation, to ensure the components work as expected. The division is especially focused on fatigue analysis and pressure analysis. The division's Analysis Group is at the forefront of the product-development process, analyzing parts or assemblies for a variety of aircraft to determine whether components meet loading requirements.
The Solution
To address the challenge, the Eaton team turned to HyperMesh, part of Altair Engineering’s HyperWorks suite. HyperMesh was introduced to the team by Ahmad Sereshteh, Eaton’s Senior Stress Analyst, who had used the tool for 20 years in Eaton’s automotive division. HyperMesh was used to analyze complex internal fluid passages, determining the proper angle at which they should intersect and the appropriate positioning of their centerlines. The tool was demonstrated using an Engine Driven Pump (EDP) cylinder block with a fairly complex geometry. With the previous process, creating a finite-element model for that component was challenging and would take three to four days to complete. However, with HyperMesh, the process was significantly improved in terms of speed, accuracy, and confidence.
Operational Impact
Quantitative Benefit
Related Case Studies.
Case Study
Airbus Soars with Wearable Technology
Building an Airbus aircraft involves complex manufacturing processes consisting of thousands of moving parts. Speed and accuracy are critical to business and competitive advantage. Improvements in both would have high impact on Airbus’ bottom line. Airbus wanted to help operators reduce the complexity of assembling cabin seats and decrease the time required to complete this task.
Case Study
Aircraft Predictive Maintenance and Workflow Optimization
First, aircraft manufacturer have trouble monitoring the health of aircraft systems with health prognostics and deliver predictive maintenance insights. Second, aircraft manufacturer wants a solution that can provide an in-context advisory and align job assignments to match technician experience and expertise.
Case Study
Integral Plant Maintenance
Mercedes-Benz and his partner GAZ chose Siemens to be its maintenance partner at a new engine plant in Yaroslavl, Russia. The new plant offers a capacity to manufacture diesel engines for the Russian market, for locally produced Sprinter Classic. In addition to engines for the local market, the Yaroslavl plant will also produce spare parts. Mercedes-Benz Russia and his partner needed a service partner in order to ensure the operation of these lines in a maintenance partnership arrangement. The challenges included coordinating the entire maintenance management operation, in particular inspections, corrective and predictive maintenance activities, and the optimizing spare parts management. Siemens developed a customized maintenance solution that includes all electronic and mechanical maintenance activities (Integral Plant Maintenance).
Case Study
Aerospace & Defense Case Study Airbus
For the development of its new wide-body aircraft, Airbus needed to ensure quality and consistency across all internal and external stakeholders. Airbus had many challenges including a very aggressive development schedule and the need to ramp up production quickly to satisfy their delivery commitments. The lack of communication extended design time and introduced errors that drove up costs.
